Scott WienerScott Wiener

SF YIMBY is proud to endorse Scott Wiener in his historic Congressional bid. The YIMBY movement would not be anywhere near where it is today if not for the work and influence of Scott Wiener. In his nine years as a State Senator, he has worked tirelessly on impactful legislation that has ignited the YIMBY movement nationwide and inspired countless other legislators throughout the country. We have no doubt he can have the same impact in Congress.

Highlights of his long legislative record include:

SB 35 (https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201720180SB35): one of his first bills, removed needless roadblocks and sped up the production thousands of affordable homes across California and over 3,400 in just San Francisco alone (https://www.sfchronicle.com/politics/article/sb35-new-housing-law-17777302.php).

SB 828 (https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201720180SB828): reformed state planning law and actually provided a real path to require San Francisco to produce the homes it desperately needs

SB 423 (https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240SB423): permanently codified SB 35 and added provisions to make it stronger

SB 79 (https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB79): his most recent achievement, legalized multi-family housing near major transit hubs throughout the state

Scott has been unwavering in his commitment to building more housing, even when it was politically difficult. He has been the YIMBY movement's most important champion in elected office, and we stand with the leader who has stood with us from the beginning. As the YIMBY movement goes nationwide, we can't think of a better champion to represent us in Washington.

Source (https://yimbyaction.org/endorsements/2026/june-2026-california-primary-election-voter-guide)

SF YIMBY is proud to endorse Scott Wiener in his historic Congressional bid. The YIMBY movement would not be anywhere near where it is today if not for the work and influence of Scott Wiener. In his nine years as a State Senator, he has worked tirelessly on impactful legislation that has ignited the YIMBY movement nationwide and inspired countless other legislators throughout the country. We have no doubt he can have the same impact in Congress.

Highlights of his long legislative record include:

SB 35 (https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201720180SB35): one of his first bills, removed needless roadblocks and sped up the production thousands of affordable homes across California and over 3,400 in just San Francisco alone (https://www.sfchronicle.com/politics/article/sb35-new-housing-law-17777302.php).

SB 828 (https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201720180SB828): reformed state planning law and actually provided a real path to require San Francisco to produce the homes it desperately needs

SB 423 (https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240SB423): permanently codified SB 35 and added provisions to make it stronger

SB 79 (https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB79): his most recent achievement, legalized multi-family housing near major transit hubs throughout the state

Scott has been unwavering in his commitment to building more housing, even when it was politically difficult. He has been the YIMBY movement's most important champion in elected office, and we stand with the leader who has stood with us from the beginning. As the YIMBY movement goes nationwide, we can't think of a better champion to represent us in Washington.

Source (https://sfyimby.org/endorsements/2026-primary-election/)

We recommend voting for Scott Wiener for U.S. House of Representatives, District 11.

Scott Wiener has spent the last decade as one of California's most persistent and effective pro-housing legislators. As a former San Francisco supervisor (https://www.scottwiener.com/meet-scott) and now the state senator representing District 11 (San Francisco) (https://sd11.senate.ca.gov/district), he has built a record on the issues that most directly shape San Francisco's quality of life and cost of living: housing production, transit, and government's ability to actually deliver.

In this field, Wiener stands out because he has already passed big, controversial laws in hostile political conditions — and that matters in Washington, where rhetoric is cheap and follow-through is not. Like every candidate, there are things we don't align with Wiener on (his positions on AI regulation and public safety diverge from ours in places), but he's still the best choice for getting results.

"Results over rhetoric. My job isn't to maintain ideological purity; it's to improve people's lives."
Scott Wiener, State Senator, District 11

Why vote for Scott Wiener?

Scott Wiener's top policy goals are:

1. Build more housing to lower the cost of living

Wiener's strongest argument in this race is simple: he has actually passed pro-housing law at scale. SB 35 (https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201720180SB35) forced cities that weren't building enough housing to approve qualifying projects automatically. SB 423 (https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240SB423) extended and tightened that framework. And SB 79 (https://sd11.senate.ca.gov/news/governor-newsom-signs-senator-wieners-landmark-law-build-more-homes-near-public-transit), signed in 2025, legalized mid-rise apartment buildings near major transit stops throughout California. Those laws did not solve California's housing crisis on their own, but they changed the terms of the fight — making it harder for cities to dodge their housing obligations and easier to get badly needed homes approved.

But state law can only do so much. The country is short 8 million homes, and Congress controls the federal tools that decide how housing gets paid for and built — tax credits, Section 8 vouchers, and environmental review rules. Wiener wants to expand housing tax credits, fund rental assistance, reward cities that build, and cut through federal red tape. He treats housing as both a building problem and a rules problem. We need someone in Congress who gets how permitting, timelines, and financing keep homes from getting built.

2. Protect transit and urban infrastructure San Francisco depends on

San Francisco's affordability depends on whether people can get around the city and region reliably. In 2023, Muni and BART were staring down a multi-billion-dollar fiscal cliff (https://sfstandard.com/2023/05/31/public-transit-state-budget-scott-wiener-gavin-newsom-transportation/) that threatened service cuts across the region. Wiener built the coalition (https://sfstandard.com/2023/02/09/wieners-big-ask-in-sacramento-a-lifeline-for-bart-muni/) that kept both systems running — bringing together labor, environmental groups, suburban counties, business associations, and urban riders to secure $1.1 billion in emergency state funding (https://www.kqed.org/news/11952821/1-1-billion-state-bailout-proposed-for-transit-agencies-facing-fiscal-cliff).

That funding bought time, not a permanent fix. With federal COVID relief exhausted and ridership still well below pre-pandemic levels, Bay Area transit is now facing another fiscal cliff in 2026 (https://www.bart.gov/about/financials/crisis) — BART alone is staring at a $376 million deficit, and Muni faces 50% service cuts without new revenue. Wiener's response was SB 63, the Connect Bay Area Act (https://sd11.senate.ca.gov/news/senators-wiener-and-arreguin-announce-bill-authorize-bay-area-public-transit-funding-measure), which authorizes a regional sales tax measure on the November 2026 ballot that would generate roughly $980 million per year (https://mtc.ca.gov/news/governor-signs-bill-authorizing-bay-area-voters-consider-2026-transit-measure) to stabilize transit across five Bay Area counties. He has done this work twice now — and he is not done.

In Congress, he wants to fix how the federal government funds transit, fight for money to keep trains running (not just build new things), and protect clean energy transit programs from getting cut. Too many politicians talk about transit as branding. Wiener has spent years doing the hard work of keeping it alive.

3. A record of governing, not just campaigning

The next Congress will be a difficult environment for a junior Democratic House member from San Francisco. Wiener's argument for why he can still get things done is credible: he has passed over 100 bills (https://sd11.senate.ca.gov/biography) in the state legislature, often against powerful opposition. He has authored major laws not just on housing but also on mental-health and addiction treatment coverage (SB 855) (https://www.gov.ca.gov/2020/09/25/governor-newsom-signs-bills-to-expand-access-to-quality-behavioral-health-care-for-all-californians-help-homeless-californians-suffering-extreme-mental-illness-on-our-streets-sidewalks/) and net neutrality (SB 822) (https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201720180SB822). That willingness to pick fights, including with his own party, and the discipline to come back with a revised version when a coalition falls short, is exactly what federal legislating requires.

Why not the other candidates?

Connie Chan has built her political career around opposing things — blocking housing, fighting development, and siding with the most obstructionist factions on the Board of Supervisors. She actively tried to weaken San Francisco's housing plan at a time when the city desperately needed to build more. She has no meaningful legislative accomplishments to point to. Sending someone to Congress whose primary skill is saying no is not what San Francisco needs right now.

Saikat Chakrabarti is running on vibes, not a track record. He talks constantly about his connections to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, but you may have noticed that AOC herself hasn't uttered a single positive word about his campaign. There's a reason for that: she fired him. Chakrabarti has been in national politics for years but has no actual record of passing legislation or delivering results for any constituency. San Francisco deserves a representative who has actually done the work, not one who name-drops someone else's.

On other issues

Technology and AI: Wiener authored SB 1047, a first-in-nation AI regulation bill, which was opposed by SF-based tech companies big and small. Governor Newsom vetoed it in 2024. Wiener followed it up with SB 53, a much narrower transparency-focused bill that drew broader industry support. We think the Federal government has a role in setting up AI regulations and guardrails, and think Wiener's approach in California has been somewhat misguided. That said, voters in the tech sector should evaluate his track record on the merits rather than the headline, and importantly, compare him to the alternatives. Both Chakrabarti and Chan would sooner ban AI than regulate it.

Healthcare and treatment: SB 855 (https://www.gov.ca.gov/2020/09/25/governor-newsom-signs-bills-to-expand-access-to-quality-behavioral-health-care-for-all-californians-help-homeless-californians-suffering-extreme-mental-illness-on-our-streets-sidewalks/) expanded mental-health and addiction treatment coverage, and his campaign platform continues to emphasize lower drug costs and broader access to care.

Civil rights and immigration: Wiener has made LGBTQ rights and immigrant protections a major part of his public record. San Francisco voters care about that, and they should.

Public safety: Wiener opposed Prop 36 (https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_36,_Drug_and_Theft_Crime_Penalties_and_Treatment-Mandated_Felonies_Initiative_(2024)), which GrowSF supported (/voter-guide/san-francisco-voter-guide-november-2024-election/) and nearly 70% of California voters passed (https://calmatters.org/politics/elections/2024/11/prop-36-california-election-result/). His approach to the fentanyl crisis emphasizes treatment access and federal interdiction funding over the accountability measures GrowSF favors. That's a real difference, but it doesn't change the overall calculus in this race.

Scott Wiener has shown he can pass hard laws on the issues San Francisco most needs solved. In a field where his opponents are defined by obstruction or aspiration, Wiener is defined by results. That's why he has our endorsement.

Source (https://growsf.org/voter-guide/san-francisco-voter-guide-june-2026-election/#house-district-11)

UAW endorsed candidate

The three main contenders are Scott Weiner, Connie Chan, and Saikat Chakrabarti. Weiner is a current CA State Senator, Chan is an SF Supervisor and Chakrabarti was AOC’s chief of staff for a bit. All support progressive priorities: Medicare for All, right to choose, federal housing support, support immigrants, LGBTQ+ rights, public transit, addressing climate change, defund Israel’s Gaza actions, peaceful foreign policy, regulate AI, tax the rich, etc. Chakrabarti criticizes Weiner for not support the proposed CA “billionaires tax,” but Weiner points out that it is one time (thus not a steady funding source), for healthcare only (rather than to CA’s General Fund for all needs), has implementation issues (valuation of personal property) and may cause wealthy people to leave CA (which relies upon them for much of its income tax). These are reasonable concerns. Chakrabarti’s solution for nearly every issue is more government programs, including a federal AI lab (far more than his proposed billionaire taxes could fund). Chakrabarti has no legislative experience, during his short stint as AOC’s chief of staff he offended many other Democratic Representatives, and AOC has not endorsed him. Chan has experience as an SF Supervisor, but that is limited to city issues. Weiner not only is right on the issues, but has introduced and worked to pass bills in the CA Legislature on many of the above issues. https://www.scottwiener.com/priorities. I want a legislator who is there to pass legislation improving Americans’ lives, not to engage in performative combat. Weiner has proven he can do so, and I endorse him.

My occupation is State Senator.

I’m relentless in taking on the toughest challenges and delivering results. I’m ready to take that leadership to Congress to make your life more affordable and end Trump’s assault on our communities. I passed groundbreaking laws to build the homes we need. In Congress, I’ll fight to build millions of homes so people can afford rent and mortgages again. I passed the strongest paid parental leave in the nation, helping working parents care for a new child without going broke. In Congress, I’ll guarantee paid family leave and childcare. I fought the insurance companies to expand mental health coverage and cap insulin co-pays at $35. In Congress, I’ll lower prescription drug costs and deliver affordable, universal healthcare. I support Medicare for All. When Trump terrorized immigrant communities, I passed a law banning federal agents from wearing masks and wrote legislation allowing victims to sue them. In Congress, I’ll stand up for our immigrant neighbors, fight to abolish ICE, and hold these extremists accountable. I’m a daily MUNI rider. I fight for reliable and safe transit, and I’ve championed funding to prevent devastating service cuts. In Congress, I’ll secure funding to improve and expand our transit systems. As a gay man, I champion and defend LGBTQ people, including transgender kids, even as I face waves of death threats from MAGA extremists for doing so. I’m endorsed by the California Democratic Party, City Attorney David Chiu, National Union of Healthcare Workers, North Coast States Carpenters Union, Human Rights Campaign, leaders across San Francisco. It would be a deep honor to represent you in Congress.

Scott Wiener has been an extremely effective legislator and visionary leader in the state Senate.

His achievements include

• Being the earliest and most powerful pro-housing legislator, including on a national stage. He passed SB 828 to get SF to build 80,000 new homes in 8 years, and also passed SB 35 and SB 423, which make it easier to get housing developments approved in California and have directly led to thousands of new homes.
• Pro-LGBT, progressive activism, and not backing down despite receiving some horrible abuse from the right.
• Pro-transit, including being a key figure in stabilizing BART and MUNI funding and keeping the systems running through and after the pandemic.
• Supporting deregulating hallucinagenic drugs and letting bars and clubs continue selling alcohol until 4a, instead of the current 2a.

He’s now running for Nancy Pelosi’s seat in Congress (in the House), and while the federal government is even more polarized and broken than the CA state government, I am optimistic Scott will continue to find ways to work across the aisle with Republicans and more moderate Democrats to craft effective policy.

He has two credible opponents in the primary: Connie Chan and Saikat Chakrabarti. (If you want to protest vote because all three are to your left, vote Marie Hurabiell, a former Republican who recently became a Democrat and has good policies on eg small modular nuclear reactors and Prop 36).

All three of Scott, Connie, and Saikat have similar headline policy positions: oppose Trump, abolish ICE, expand healthcare access, etc. I covered a recent congressional forum here. Policy-wise, Connie and Saikat are to Scott’s left: they support the proposed 5% billionaire tax prop that has already driven Sergey Brin and other rich people out of the state and would hurt our economic climate and startup scene if passed. They also are more strident on the hot-among-the-youth issue of Israel. Along with Scott, they oppose (in their words) the genocide in Gaza and the sale of offensive weapons to Israel; but they go farther and also oppose selling defensive weapons to the lone liberal democracy in the Middle East, the only Jewish state (while having no comment on arms sales to Saudi Arabia or Pakistan).

Saikat Chakrabarti earned $100M+ as an early Stripe engineer and now opposes essentially all forms of campaign funding other than self-funding. He moved back to San Francisco sometime after losing his job as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s (AOC’s) chief of staff after 7 months on the job, in 2019. He lacks support from local progressive groups (they’re supporting the ineffectual Connie Chan), so instead leans on nationally prominent leftist figures like Hasan Piker and youth energy for his platform of radically changing the Democratic Party by refusing to work within the system and instead applying outside activist pressure. His housing platform is pretty good, actually, and if he toned down the slopulism and zero-sum vibes (tax-the-rich, all corporations are bad, etc), I could imagine supporting him for a different seat. But Scott Wiener is a uniquely effective leader that has already delivered the kind of change Saikat is promising — he almost-singlehandedly made the California government support YIMBY policies rather than blocking new homes in our metro areas. On an issue like AI regulation, Saikat has murky promises to nationalize the labs and give workers the profits from AI, but Scott is the one who’s actually crafted regulations that Gavin Newsom was willing to sign into law.

He has already worked to get a bill past to start on this; is in favor of adding more restrictions including restricting use of data for training models even if they don't store the data itself

VIG listing; Occupation: State Senator; endorsed by California Democratic Party; passed groundbreaking housing laws

I strongly believe Scott Wiener will be a fantastic congressperson. He has a track record that shows he not only fights for progressive values, but also actually gets things done. He's accomplished so much for SF and California, and I can't wait to see what he does at the federal level.

Dual endorsement with Connie Chan

Scott Wiener is an effective legislator. While I might not be 100% aligned with his opinions, I'm confident he will actually get more of the priorities of SF advanced in congress.

This is especially true of housing, where he has passed numerous bills at the state level that have laid the groundwork for more housing in SF.

LGBTQ candidate

Wrote SB 53, CA's signature AI safety legislation