California Proposition 39 está en la boleta del 3 de noviembre de 2026.
Qué hace
Require voters to present government-issued identification when casting ballots and require election officials to use government data to confirm voter citizenship and report verification rates
En tu boleta
Establishes additional voter identification and citizenship verification requirements. Initiative constitutional amendment.
Qué significa votar no
A "no" vote opposes this ballot initiative, leaving existing law in place, under which:
voters are not required to present a government-issued ID when voting; and
voters must attest to their citizenship under penalty of perjury and provide identifying information when registering; election officials are not required to use government data to verify those attestations or to report citizenship verification rates.
Únete a un grupo para agregar sus recomendaciones a tu boleta.

Rick's Picks
Dirigido por Rick Raushenbush · 96 votantes
Prop. 39 is unnecessary, expensive, creates a risk that your mail-in ballot will be discarded, and may disenfranchise voters who are eligible to vote. Numerous studies have determined that voter fraud (an ineligible voter impersonating an eligible voter) is incredibly rare and has no impact on election results. Republicans claim that “voter ID” is needed to restore “trust in elections,” but any lack of trust derives from Republicans’ baseless claims of voter fraud. Prop. 39 is just one of many attempts to suppress voting. I will vote NO.
As the Legislative Analyst notes: “A person must be a U.S. citizen to vote in any state or federal election. A noncitizen who votes in a state or federal election can be fined and/or sentenced to prison.” To vote in California, a person must register to vote and provide government identification showing that they are a U.S. citizen, live in California and are at least 18 years old. In person voters typically sign next to their name on the list of verified voters for that precinct. Voters who vote by mail must sign the ballot return envelope and the signature is verified against the voter registration signature before the ballot is counted.
Prop. 39 would amend the California Constitution to require an in-person voter to present “government-issued identification” and a voter by mail to write on the outside of the ballot return envelope “the last four digits of a unique identifying number from government-issued identification that matches the one designated by the voter for their voter registration.”
There are a number of problems here. First, “government-issued identification” is defined only as “documentation that allows conclusive verification of the voter’s identity.” Under the Trump-backed SAVE Act (not passed), such identification would be limited to documents such as US passports (which many Americans do not have), a certified birth certificate (which I suspect almost no Americans have), Certificate of Naturalization (only if you are a legal immigrant), or a REAL ID (which requires similar documents to obtain). If you married and changed your name, you have additional hurdles—like a certified court order approving the name change. At this point, we don’t know what documents would qualify under Prop. 39—and how many Californians would have such documents.
Second, the vote-by-mail requirement poses risks of both identify theft and disenfranchisement. Writing even the last four digits of an ID card on the outside of a ballot return envelope also bearing your name and address risks identity theft. Also, if you forget which government-issued ID you used to register to vote and use the wrong one for the numbers you write on the ballot return envelope (e.g., using a drivers license on one and your SSN on the other), your ballot will be thrown away.
There is no reason to take these risks. Nor is there a reason to incur the costs of implementing Prop. 39, which the Legislative Analysis estimates are in the “tens of millions of dollars to low hundreds of millions of dollars.” Voter fraud through impersonation is mostly mythical. Republicans like to cite the Orange County woman who registered her dog to vote, allegedly to reveal “flaws” in the system, but she was caught and charged with five felonies. Recent news is about the US Dept. of Justice claiming 16,000 non-citizens voted in Nevada, which it then revised down to 185 names, which Nevada then compared to its records and found all were citizens. Notwithstanding Trump election-deniers’ efforts to claim fraud, there is no evidence of it. Prop. 39 is a flawed solution to a non-existent problem, and should be rejected.
Liberal moms of north county
Dirigido por Rachel · 30 votantes

Vote Like a Mother in San Diego County, CA
Dirigido por Shannon Schneider · 27 votantes

GrowSF's Voting Group
Publicado por Sway
In-person impersonation, the only fraud a photo ID check can stop, is about the rarest event in American elections: a Brennan Center review (https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/analysis-heritage-foundations-database-undermines-claims-recent-voter) of the Heritage Foundation's database of proven fraud cases (https://www.heritage.org/voterfraud) found just 10 cases across billions of votes.
Prop 39's citizenship checks ask only for officials' "best efforts" against government data, and the state already verifies your identity (https://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/voter-registration) against DMV and Social Security records when you register to vote.
The real change lands on the four out of five Californians who vote by mail (https://www.sos.ca.gov/elections). Prop 39 makes you write four digits of an ID number on your return envelope, and they must match the ID number sitting in your registration file. Forget which number you registered with, or transpose a digit, and your valid ballot has a brand-new way to get rejected, on top of the signature check that already works.
For this, the Legislative Analyst's Office estimates (https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2025-007) it will cost in the tens of millions to low hundreds of millions of dollars per year, all to chase a non-existent problem, all while making your own ballot easier to reject. Vote no.
Source (https://growsf.org/voter-guide/san-francisco-voter-guide-november-2026-election#prop-39)
Human Decency
Dirigido por Kristin · 17 votantes

Working Families Party's Voting Group
Publicado por Sway

San Francisco League of Pissed Off Voters' Voting Group
Publicado por Sway
Prop 39 is a bullshit Voter ID law put forth by Trump’s lackeys to stoke fears of “illegal voting” this November. MAGA Republicans put Prop 39 on the ballot, even though massive voter fraud is a straight-up myth. (https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/02/us/politics/trump-election-voter-fraud.html) Experts overwhelmingly agree that widespread voter fraud— both in California and nationally—is a "Big Lie." (https://calmatters.org/explainers/california-voter-fraud/) So why are Republicans pushing Prop 39, which would amend the California constitution to require voters to show government-issued ID at the polls? Maybe because they’re afraid of voters.
Under Prop 39, voters would need to give the last four digits of a government ID, such as a driver’s license number, at the polls. The measure would also require election officials to maintain voter registration lists with citizenship checks, and to verify IDs before counting ballots.
This proposition comes on top of all the voter suppression measures at the national level—gerrymandering to weaken Black districts (https://www.npr.org/2026/07/23/nx-s1-5896335/black-voters-republican-redistricting) , trying to end mail-in voting (https://abcnews.com/US/usps-makes-new-rules-mail-ballots/story?id=135879673), encouraging states to make it harder to vote (https://www.npr.org/2026/08/25/nx-s1-5940004/voter-id-citizenship-ballot-measures), and railing constantly about “voter fraud (https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/02/us/politics/trump-election-voter-fraud.html).” By establishing strict voter ID laws, with layers of cumbersome “verification,” Prop 39 would create unnecessary hurdles for students, seniors, low-income residents, and people with disabilities, who are less likely to have up-to-date driver’s licenses. Ultimately, the plan would lead to longer lines at the polls, and eligible voters having their ballots tossed out. Fewer votes, less democracy: that’s the MAGA plan.
Prop 39 is also super-wasteful. It would cost hundreds of millions of dollars each year in an attempt to fix a problem that everybody agrees doesn’t exist. It’s a costly political stunt we can’t afford. The good news is we only need 50% of voters to shut this thing down—vote HELL NO on Prop 39!
Source (https://www.theleaguesf.org/#Prop39)

Sophisticated Socials: The Informed Voter Collective
Dirigido por Lera Ashe · 15 votantes
This measure is requiring a California ID when voting it. A Yes vote means you will always need an ID for in person voting and if voting by absentee the last four digits of your ID. In addition once a year confirm your US citizenship. A No vote means we continue with how elections are currently being ran. This proposition was created by the Republican Party and Republican advocates. It is unnecessary because there are several rules in place to prevent voter fraud. voter fraud is super rare in California.

California Environmental Voters' Voting Group
Publicado por Sway

Voters in Action
Dirigido por Devon · 14 votantes

California Teachers Association's Voting Group
Publicado por Sway
Meadiocrity Crew
Dirigido por Carter Menig · 11 votantes
Blue Lodi
Dirigido por Lisa McBride · 10 votantes

Equality California's Voting Group
Publicado por Sway

SPUR's Voting Group
Publicado por Sway
SPUR's Recommendation
California already has safeguards to protect election integrity. When registering, voters certify eligibility under penalty of perjury and provide identifying information. In-person voters state their name and address and sign the roster, while signature verification is used for vote-by-mail ballots. Illegal voting is a felony. California has no evidence of widespread voter fraud, despite allegations following the 2020 presidential election. Research has found that strict voter ID requirements can create barriers for voters who lack acceptable identification.
In September 2024, California enacted SB 1174, which prohibits local governments — including charter cities — from requiring voters to present identification to vote unless required by state or federal law. Prop. 39 would override this prohibition and establish a statewide voter ID requirement.
Implementing the strict voter ID requirements in this proposition could impose high costs on state and local governments. Without evidence of widespread voter fraud, adding barriers to voting and imposing significant implementation costs on already-strained public budgets is not a good investment.
What Prop. 39 Would Do
Proposition 39 would amend the California Constitution to add three new requirements to statewide voter rules:
The proposition language does not specify which forms of ID would qualify or how citizenship would be verified. Instead, it authorizes the Legislature to pass implementing legislation to work out those details after voters pass the initiative.
The Backstory
The federal Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA) was enacted to protect the constitutional right to vote for Black Americans and other minority groups. For decades, it provided federal oversight of elections in jurisdictions with histories of discrimination. However, recent Supreme Court decisions have weakened key VRA provisions. As a result, states face fewer barriers to adopting stricter voter ID laws, reducing early voting, closing polling locations, and changing election procedures, raising concerns about voter access and representation.
Under the 2002 Help America Vote Act, all first-time voters in federal elections who registered by mail must show ID. California also verifies voter identity with a driver’s license number, state identification number, or the last four digits of a Social Security number when registering people to vote, attesting under penalty of perjury that they are U.S. citizens. In addition, states verify signatures on vote-by-mail ballots.
Since the 2020 presidential election, public claims of voter fraud have increased, despite extremely low instances in U.S. elections. Currently, 36 states require some form of identification at polling sites. Of those, only nine states have “strict” voter ID laws that require a voter to present an ID (some states require a photo ID; others do not) to cast a ballot. Voters without proper ID must cast a provisional ballot and then take additional steps before their ballot is officially counted. In the remaining 27 “non-strict” voter ID states, voters without proper ID can sign an affidavit verifying their identity (subject to perjury).
State Voter ID Requirements as of 2020
Source: National Conference of State Legislatures (https://www.ncsl.org/elections-and-campaigns/voter-id?utm_source=chatgpt.com)
Recently, Republican Party leaders have made efforts to enact voter ID laws in California. In September 2024, the state Legislature passed Senate Bill 1174, which prohibits local governments in California from enacting their own voter ID requirements. The state then sued Huntington Beach over its 2024 voter ID measure, arguing that state election law preempted it. In January 2026, the California Supreme Court sided with the state and struck down Huntington Beach’s local voter ID requirement.
In January 2025, Assemblymember Carl DeMaio introduced the California Voter ID and Election Integrity Act of 2025 (Assembly Bill 25), pursuing a legislative path to a statewide voter ID law. The bill failed on a party-line vote in April 2025. This year, a federal voter ID law, H.R.7296, the SAVE America Act, was introduced to Congress. If H.R. 7296 were to pass, voters in all states would be required to present photo identification showing U.S. citizenship when voting, preempting state laws.
Assemblymember DeMaio’s organization, Reform California, pursued the voter initiative process this year and gathered signatures for Prop. 39. If passed, California would join the nine states with strict voter ID requirements. Prop. 39 requires a simple majority (50% plus one vote) to pass.
Equity Impacts
Research consistently finds that voters of color, low-income individuals, elderly voters, students, people with disabilities, and those who recently changed their names are less likely to possess the specific government-issued IDs required under strict voter ID laws and are more likely to face barriers to obtaining them. Costs — including fees for birth certificates and other documents, transportation to government offices, and time away from work — can create additional burdens. Researchers have documented racial disparities in ID possession and evidence that strict voter ID requirements can widen racial turnout gaps. Approximately 13% of Black Americans lack acceptable voter ID, compared with 5% of white Americans, making voter ID laws a significant equity issue.
Pros
• SPUR could not identify any benefits to this measure.
Cons
• Studies have found that voter ID laws do not reduce actual or perceived voter fraud.
• Government-issued ID requirements can create barriers for eligible voters, increase ballot rejections from data-entry errors, slow voting, and disproportionately affect people who face challenges taking time off work, traveling to obtain ID, or securing required documentation.
• Including partial ID numbers with names and addresses on mail-ballot envelopes (as would be required under this proposition) could increase privacy and identity-theft risks when combined with information exposed through other data breaches.
• Prop. 39 would impose additional costs on state and local governments, with estimated one-time costs in the tens of millions of dollars and ongoing annual costs ranging from tens to hundreds of millions, depending on future legislative requirements.
Source (https://www.spur.org/voter-guide/2026-11/ca-prop-39-california-voter-id)
MIDTERMS MATTER
Dirigido por Isaac Wilkins · 33 votantes
NO!
This would require additional barriers to voting.
current conditions: License or form of ID, signature
New conditions:
everything above
last 4 of social security
verification methods that will be set up by State( meaning they havent come up with them yet but it gives them the authority to craft up their own).

California Labor Federation's Voting Group
Publicado por Sway

Courage California's Voting Group
Publicado por Sway

California Nurses Association / National Nurses United's Voting Group
Publicado por Sway
San Diego Democrats for Equality's Voting Group
Publicado por Sway

Alice B Toklas LGBTQ Democratic Club's Voting Group
Publicado por Sway

California Democratic Party's Voting Group
Publicado por Sway
• The California Democratic Party is proud to stand alongside our Democratic leaders in the fight to defeat Proposition 39. Prop 39 rewrites voting rules to keep Trump and his cronies in power and to make it harder for you to vote. • California Democrats have proven that when we stand together and organize, we win. We proved that with Proposition 50, delivering an overwhelming victory, showing Donald Trump that when he tries to rig our democracy, California fights back and wins. Now we’re putting that same energy into defeating Trump’s latest dirty trick – Prop 39. • Last year, Trump tried to rig the maps. Now, with Prop 39, he’s trying to rig the rules around voting itself.

California School Employees Association's Voting Group
Publicado por Sway
i love los angeles & i want to live here forever so let's make it good
Dirigido por Aayushi · 4 votantes
voter id is a solution to a problem that does not exist. this will simply make it so much harder for people to vote and disenfranchise so many who are unable to react to the administrative barriers created.
Let’s head to the polls in numbers!!
Dirigido por Rachel · 4 votantes

SEIU Local 521's Voting Group
Publicado por Sway
Uplift Oakland
Dirigido por Nat · 4 votantes
Hell no
Vote for Progress
Dirigido por Carolina Esparza · 4 votantes

Meg’s Voting Vibes
Dirigido por Meg · 18 votantes

Harvey Milk LGBTQ Democratic Club's Voting Group
Publicado por Sway

Planned Parenthood Advocates Mar Monte's Voting Group
Publicado por Sway

SEIU California's Voting Group
Publicado por Sway

Sierra Club California's Voting Group
Publicado por Sway
Student Ballot Party
Dirigido por Julianna · 3 votantes

ACLU California Action's Voting Group
Publicado por Sway
• ### No Proposition 39 - Prohibits citizens from voting unless they present government-issued ID
Voting is a fundamental right, and every eligible Californian should be able to cast a ballot without unnecessary barriers.
Prop 39 would require voters to present a government-issued identification card for in-person voting and add a personal ID number on vote-by-mail envelopes. The measure is unclear on which kinds of ID would be accepted, creating an unnecessary barrier to the democratic process that will deny eligible voters access to the polls. These barriers would make it harder for eligible Californians to vote and put voter privacy at risk.
The burdens created by Prop 39 would especially affect voters who already face obstacles to participating in our democracy including voters of color, young voters, and voters with disabilities.
ACLU California Action says NO on Prop 39. Californians should protect every eligible person’s freedom to vote – not make it harder to exercise that right.
California Lutherans For Social Justice
Dirigido por John Halbert · 2 votantes
Requires voters to present a government-issued ID for in-person voting or provide the last four digits of a government-issued ID designated during voter registration for mail-in voting.
“[G]overnment becomes oppressive when its goals, policies, and programs are designed or transformed into vehicles for oppressing the neighbor—such as voter suppression laws or gerrymandering. Civic participation cannot be fully realized without confronting the structural barriers that limit access for many. These barriers, which function to silence voices and restrict public engagement, disproportionately affect already marginalized communities and contradict both democratic ideals and the biblical call to seek justice.” Faith and Civic Life, p. 65.

Chinese American Democratic Club's Voting Group
Publicado por Sway
Requires government-issued identification for in-person voting, identifying information for mail ballots, and additional government efforts to verify voters' citizenship. CADC opposes Prop. 39 because citizenship is already required to vote and California already uses voter-registration and signature-verification systems. The committee concluded that the additional requirements could create unnecessary barriers for eligible voters while imposing potentially substantial new state and local administrative costs.
CADC 認為現行制度已要求選民具公民資格並設有登記及簽名核實程序,新增身分證明要求可能為合資格選民增加不必要的投票障礙及政府成本,因此反對提案 39。

Edwin M. Lee Asian Pacific Democratic Club's Voting Group
Publicado por Sway
Mutual aid and Voting
Dirigido por Lisa J · 2 votantes
Our Curious Coven's Voting Guide-Eat the Richest
Dirigido por Deleted User · 2 votantes
This is a voter suppression bill akin to the SAVE Act-sponsored by Republicans, which aims to make it more difficult to vote for millions of people. Requiring ID will make it harder for eligible voters who don’t have a driver’s license or other supporting documents to vote, and it will disproportionately affect those with disabilities, who are low-income or have recently moved. This bill, estimated to cost hundreds of millions to implement annually, is about importing election lies into California and creating opportunities to reject eligible ballots and wrongly target voters through error-prone citizen checks.

Sierra Club Angeles Chapter's Voting Group
Publicado por Sway
United Teachers Los Angeles' Voting Group
Publicado por Sway

Andrew's Picks
Dirigido por Andrew Sun · 1 votante

Alameda County Democratic Party's Voting Group
Publicado por Sway
Ballot Research Party: Let's Figure This Out!
Dirigido por JamieAnn Kaskowitz · 1 votante
A problem in search of a solution. Will cost us millions $ annually to implement this with no hope of improving a insignificant problem with our elections.
Berkeley Progressives
Dirigido por Berkeley progressives · 1 votante
Theleaguesf.org recommends No.
Brendan Quinn’s Recs
Dirigido por Brendan Quinn · 1 votante
Would require voter ID to address non-existent voter fraud

California State Building and Construction Trades Council's Voting Group
Publicado por Sway

Libertarian Party of California's Voting Group
Publicado por Sway
Menace gals
Dirigido por Donna Reid · 1 votante

NAACP California-Hawaii State Conference's Voting Group
Publicado por Sway
Proposition 39: Requires Government-Issued Identification to Vote – NO. Proposition 39 would require in-person voters to show government-issued identification and mail voters to write the last four digits of a selected government ID number on the ballot envelope. It also would require citizenship verification of voter rolls and create a free state voter-ID card. Supporters say these rules would increase confidence in elections. But California already verifies identity during registration and verifies signatures on mail ballots. A free card does not erase the burdens of obtaining documents, traveling to an issuing office, correcting mismatched records, or navigating disability and language barriers. An omitted or mismatched number could put an otherwise lawful mail ballot at risk. The state estimates tens of millions to low hundreds of millions of dollars in annual implementation costs. Our history teaches us that voting rules written without explicit racial distinctions can still impose unequal burdens: unnecessary barriers fall hardest on Black voters, low-income voters, seniors, people with disabilities, students, and voters who move frequently. Vote No.
Source (https://cahinaacp.org/our-vote-our-voice-where-we-stand-on-every-2026-ballot-measure)
only me
Dirigido por Sherrie Stone · 1 votante

Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California's Voting Group
Publicado por Sway

Roy's Picks
Dirigido por Roy Steele · 1 votante
sacyoungdems
Dirigido por Evan Cragin · 1 votante

San Francisco Green Party's Voting Group
Publicado por Sway
Make it harder to vote by requiring people to show ID or write it on mail-in ballot
Source (https://www.sfgreenparty.org/endorsements/123-november-2026-endorsements)

San Francisco Tenants Union's Voting Group
Publicado por Sway
SF Solidarity Club
Publicado por Sway

Taylor's SCV Guide
Dirigido por Taylor Irene · 1 votante
We already prove who we are to vote 8n California. This is a voter disenfranchisement measure.
Urbanists & SF Love
Dirigido por Juliana Lamm-Perez · 1 votante
Wellstone Democratic Renewal Club's Voting Group
Publicado por Sway

Teamsters Joint Council 7's Voting Group
Publicado por Sway

AFL-CIO Inland Empire Labor Council 2026 Endorsements
Publicado por Sway
Ballots and Brunch
Dirigido por Christina Livingston

Berkeley Tenants Union's Voting Group
Publicado por Sway
California Council of Churches IMPACT's Voting Group
Publicado por Sway
California Church IMPACT recommends a NO vote
Did you sign the petition for this initiative? Did you have to show federally qualified ID to do it? No — because signature-gathering is already scrutinized for legal residence and the right to participate in our elections. Voting works exactly the same way.
This proposition is essentially an end-run around the failed federal SAVE (Safeguard Voter Eligibility) Act. Like that bill, it would require new state and federal identification, shown at the polls or entered as the last four digits on mailed or dropped-off ballot envelopes.
For forty years, conservative think tanks like the Heritage Foundation have searched for evidence of ineligible voters. The number found — out of billions of votes cast — is fewer than 100. And the widely cited “dog that voted in Orange County” case doesn’t show a system failure: the woman who registered and voted using her dog’s name was arrested as soon as it was discovered. The system worked as designed.
Opponents argue this measure would function as a de facto poll tax — burdening low-income voters, people with disabilities, the elderly and infirm, and others who face barriers to obtaining new ID, while disproportionately affecting voters of color, new citizens, and others likely to oppose the measure’s backers.
Critics conclude there’s no evidence of meaningful voter fraud, and no reason to impose new barriers, costs, or hardships on eligible voters — calling Prop. 39 an attempt at voter suppression rather than a fraud-prevention measure. There is no voter fraud. Recommend a NO vote
Castro Valley Democratic Club 2026 Endorsements
Publicado por Sway
East Area Progressive Democrats' Voting Group
Publicado por Sway
Prohibit citizen voting unless displaying government-issued ID.
Source (https://www.eapd.la/endorsements)

IFPTE Local 21's Voting Group
Publicado por Sway
Indivisible Marin Steering Committee 2026 Endorsements
Publicado por Sway
Recommends to vote "No"
Indivisible SF's Voting Group
Publicado por Sway
NO on Proposition 39: California voters already prove our identity and citizenship when we register to vote. Prop 39 would add an onerous requirement that we bring photo ID when voting in person. This is the same voter-suppression strategy of adding hoops to jump through that MAGA Republicans have been rolling out across the country. Vote NO on bringing it to California.
John George Democratic Club's Voting Group
Publicado por Sway
LA Wes Recommendations
Dirigido por Wes
This is a voter suppression prop. This makes it harder for people to vote, disenfranchises low income, immigrant, and voters of color, and makes it easier to toss our ballots. Do not vote for this.

League of Women Voters California's Voting Group
Publicado por Sway
PROHIBITS VOTING WITHOUT GOVERNMENT-ISSUED ID
Prop 39 is a partisan power grab to further President Trump’s voter suppression efforts. It is based on lies about our elections. Prop 39 is intended to make it harder to vote and easier for politicians to decide which voters count. Right-wing billionaires spent millions to put it on the ballot.
• California’s elections are already secure. Voters swear to citizenship under penalty of perjury, and officials verify identity at registration, check the rolls in person, and match every mail ballot signature.
• A new registration hurdle. Millions of existing voters could be forced to effectively re-register to “designate” a government ID for mail voting, like a driver’s license or Social Security number.
• Identity theft risk. You would be required to put the last four digits of that sensitive ID number on the outside of your ballot envelope – next to your name, address, and signature.
• Valid ballots thrown out. Your mailed ballot would not be counted if the number you wrote didn’t match the “designated” number. One wrong digit or a blank field could sink a valid ballot, with no guaranteed notice or chance to fix it. Texas tried this and rejected one in eight mail ballots. Those voters were less likely to vote again.
• An ID check every time you vote in person. You would have to show a government-issued ID every time, even after officials verified who you are. Most voters turned away under similar laws elsewhere had qualifying ID, just not on them.
• A modern-day poll tax. A “free” ID is not free. Getting one costs transportation, childcare, time off work, and fees for the paperwork behind it. Seniors, students, low-income workers, voters with disabilities, and voters of color are hit hardest.
• Valid ID still must match. Nearly 30 percent of U.S. adults have changed their name, 94 percent of them women. Californians who took a new name at marriage, and transgender voters whose documents lag may hold valid ID and be turned away anyway.
• Bad data and wrongful purges. Citizenship checks would likely run through untrustworthy federal databases that wrongly flag eligible citizens to purge them from voter rolls.
• Longer lines and slower results. Extra ID checks and flagged ballots add delay, and the lawsuits would stretch it further, handing election deniers more time to spread lies.
• Hundreds of millions of dollars every year. New systems, staffing, free ID cards, audits, and lawsuits, all paid for while California already has budget problems.
Don’t let President Trump and right-wing billionaires decide whose vote counts.

Los Angeles County Young Democrats' Voting Group
Publicado por Sway
Metropolitan Greater Oakland Democratic Club 2026 Endorsements
Publicado por Sway
My test in prod group
Dirigido por Barak Gila
Nick’s Picks 4 SF&CA
Dirigido por Nick Knezek

Potrero Hill Democratic Club's Voting Group
Publicado por Sway
San Diego & Imperial Counties Labor Council 2026 Endorsements
Publicado por Sway

San Diego County Building and Construction Trades Council's Voting Group
Publicado por Sway

San Diego County Young Democrats' Voting Group
Publicado por Sway

SEIU Local 1000 2026 Endorsements
Publicado por Sway
Recommends to vote "No"

SEIU Local 2015 Ballot Recommendations
Publicado por Sway

SEIU Local 221's Voting Group
Publicado por Sway
South Bay on the DL
Dirigido por Kenny Johnson

Teamsters Joint Council 42's Voting Group
Publicado por Sway
Union Yes San Diego's Voting Group
Publicado por Sway

United Democratic Club of San Francisco's Voting Group
Publicado por Sway
United Domestic Workers' Voting Group
Publicado por Sway
Vote No Prop 39:
Prohibits Voting Without Government-Issued ID
Requires government ID to vote, creating new barriers for seniors and people with disabilities.
Source (https://www.udw.org/vote#ballot)
We <3 Participatory Democracy
Dirigido por Kiran
Prop 39 is a Republican initiative that requires government-issued ID for in-person voters and identifying information for mail voting, plus new citizenship-verification/reporting requirements. Voting is a democratic right, not something conditioned on navigating unnecessary administrative barriers. This is a proposal to add as many barriers as possible to voters to stop a non-existent fraud problem. California DSA endorses a No vote.
William's Picks
Dirigido por William Newsom
Prop 39: Yes (Voter ID)