Colorado Amendment 86 está en la boleta del 3 de noviembre de 2026.
Qué hace
Require congressional maps drawn in 2028 to be approved by both a nonpolitical commission and the state supreme court
En tu boleta
Shall there be an amendment to the Colorado Constitution concerning congressional redistricting, and, in connection therewith, reenacting the current process for congressional redistricting in the Colorado Constitution and prohibiting modifications to a final map unless at least three public meetings are held, the modifications do not have the effect of dividing communities of interest or purposefully favoring one political party, and are approved by the congressional redistricting commission and the Colorado Supreme Court?
Investiga la boleta completa de Colorado
Mira tu boleta completaQué significa votar no
A "no" vote opposes amending the Colorado Constitution, thereby maintaining the current system in which redistricting plans are reviewed only by the independent commission and the state supreme court following the U.S. decennial census.
Agrega un grupo para ver sus recomendaciones en tu boleta.
Indivisible Colorado Springs 2026 Endorsements
Publicado por Sway
In the last year, we’ve seen some of our neighboring states change their congressional districts to give one political party more power. Now a special interest group is trying to create confusion in Colorado. Amendment 86 is intended to restrict mid-decade redistricting. We recommend voting NO on this amendment. - Amendment 86 removes and reenacts the congressional redistricting laws that we voted on in 2018, with one change. It requires that any mid-decade changes are approved by our independent Congressional Redistricting Commission and the Colorado Supreme Court. - Amendment 86 ignores that the Colorado Supreme Court has ruled against mid-decade redistricting in 2003 to protect voters’ rights. So, we already have a court ruling against mid-decade changes that the special interest group funding this amendment wants to replace. - Amendment 86 seeks to reduce Colorado’s voice at the federal level by limiting our ability to respond to bad-faith activities by other states. The current constitution already provides fair and non-partisan redistricting every 10 years if the census reveals the need for change. This is a wasteful effort meant to confuse us.

Working Families Party's Voting Group
Publicado por Sway

Colorado Democratic Party 2026 Endorsements
Publicado por Sway
Ballots Without the BS
Dirigido por Jennifer Repa · 1 votante
Regular redistricting follows each census; the next commission is scheduled for 2031. Current law has no specific off-cycle process. Creates an unnecessary barrier if voters want new districts because of changing priorities or other states' partisan maps. The same commission should not control reconsideration of its earlier maps. Will cost the state about $370,000.
Center Action Fund 2026 Midterm General Endorsements
Publicado por Sway
Gunnison County Democratic Party 2026 Endorsements
Publicado por Sway
Logan M. Davis's recommendations
Publicado por Sway
No Hate in Our State
Dirigido por Meghan Camacho-Culligan · 12 votantes
Colorado Beast Ballot
Dirigido por Rachel Garcia · 11 votantes
A voice for our community!
Dirigido por Naomi · 8 votantes

Drew’s Recs
Dirigido por Andrew McArthur · 4 votantes

Mel’s Restorative Justice Picks
Dirigido por Melanie Rose Rodgers · 2 votantes

Queer Colorado Voters
Dirigido por Tiana · 2 votantes

Windsor, Colorado Voters
Dirigido por Tiana · 2 votantes

Tara’s Guide
Dirigido por Tara Dye · 1 votante
:)
Dirigido por Isabela Martinez
Comparte tu opinión en un grupo de votación con las personas que votan contigo.
Investiga tu boleta completa y vota con confianza en minutos.
Amendment 86 addresses the circumstances under which congressional districts can be redrawn outside the normal redistricting process.
Why Vote YES?
Congressional districts should not become political footballs that can be manipulated whenever political control changes.
Colorado already has a constitutional redistricting process. Changing congressional districts in the middle of a decade should require a compelling reason rather than becoming a tool for whichever political party temporarily controls state government.
Stable districts provide voters with greater certainty and reduce the temptation for politicians to manipulate district boundaries for partisan advantage.
This is fundamentally a matter of protecting voters from political gamesmanship.
Position: Congressional districts should not be casually redrawn in the middle of the decade for partisan purposes. Vote YES.