Georgia Amendment 2 está en la boleta del 3 de noviembre de 2026.
Qué hace
Require that probate judges be elected on a nonpartisan basis
En tu boleta
Shall the Constitution of Georgia be amended so as to require that all probate court judges be elected in nonpartisan elections?
Qué significa votar sí
A "yes" vote supports requiring that all probate judges be elected on a nonpartisan basis.
Únete a un grupo para agregar sus recomendaciones a tu boleta.
Amy's get out and vote party
Dirigido por Amy Robinson · 34 votantes
Votes & Vibes
Dirigido por Kashiera · 32 votantes
Columbia County District Three
Dirigido por Kimberly Sims · 2 votantes

DeKalb County
Dirigido por Peyton Jones · 4 votantes
Lets get informed today
Dirigido por Erica Jackson · 1 votante
Our Voice, Our Vote Voting Group
Dirigido por Deleted User · 1 votante
Vote Your Life Depends On It
Dirigido por Bonita White · 1 votante

Davida's Picks
Dirigido por Davida Huntley
I'm opposed to nonpartisian races for any judges and for DA elections, especially for just black female DA's as it currently exists in Georgia. The reason the Georgia legislature made DA elections in black counties, where black women have been elected, nonpartisian is because partisan affiliation is the best signal about the DA's legal philosophy.
Most people who even make it to the end of the ballot to vote for Judges don't know anything about a particular candidates judicial philosophy. Knowing if they are a Democrat or Republican informs the voter about what they can expect.
Taking away those designations just leaves voters with less information. Which is exactly what our current majority wants.
And taking away the partisan designation does not take away partisan interest groups from funding based on partisanship. Republicans and Democrats are still going to recruit, fund and promote their preferred candidates to run for judicial positions. The process, as it currently exists in our Supreme Court, Court of Appeals, State and Superior races is just more underground.
The judicial election process in Georgia heavily favors incumbents, who for most judicial candidates, for the last 23 years have been appointed by Republican governors. Combine incumbency with a lack of information about judicial philosophy, and we have what currently exists.
Even the timing of judicial elections is designed to suppress votes. Why do we elect Judges during low turnout primaries and not during general elections?
We need to remove the structural barriers that prevent us from electing people who are representative of the people they serve. No Supreme Court Justice has been removed by voters since 1922.
If there had been a D or R beside the names in the May judicial races we would have Justice Rankin in January. And it's no accident that "they" only want nonpartisan judicial races under the guise that the judiciary is nonpolitical.