SíSí

He wrote the concurring opinion on bail reform https://www.themarshallproject.org/2026/05/09/california-money-bail-reform-decision

I am aware of enough California Supreme Court decisions and Justice Groban's votes to recommend that he be retained.

We don't want judges to make decisions based on what voters want. We want them to follow the rule of law. Unless there's something glaringly bad about a judge (ex: criminal offense, sexual misconduct, etc.) I vote to retain seated judges

has written interesting and progressive opinions on cash bail and the burden that unnecessary pre-trial detention can put onto families; also these elections are just a check to see if the justice has done something egregiously wrong, which groban has not as far as i can tell