Florida State Supreme Court Justice
Florida
3 nov
20
Todos los que hacen una recomendación en esta contienda
5
Grupos que opinan sin hacer una recomendación
Be the CHANGE you wish to see
Dirigido por Michelle Levy · 1 votante

Empower to the People Voting Guide
Dirigido por Michelle · 3 votantes
Carlos Muniz is a DeSantis appointee that has no experience that qualifies him to be a judge. He previously worked under AG Pam Bondi, and prior to that for the Trump administration working with Betsy DeVoss in the Department of Education. Strongly Against.

Fed Up & Fired Up Crew
Dirigido por Suzanne Boyd · 1 votante
Vote NO - do NOT retain Carlos Muniz!
Here's why: In Planned Parenthood of Southwest and Central Florida v. State of Florida (April 2024), Muniz joined the 6-1 majority that overturned decades of Florida precedent, ruling that the state constitution’s right to privacy no longer protects abortion rights. The ruling allowed Florida’s 15-week abortion ban to remain in effect and paved the way for its 6-week ban.
As Chief Justice, he wrote the majority opinion upholding Gov. Ron DeSantis’s congressional map, which eliminated a former Black-performing district in North Florida (Black Voters Matter Capacity Building Institute v. Byrd, July 2025). The decision was widely viewed as a major victory for DeSantis and significantly affected Florida’s congressional districts.
Save the Middle Class
Dirigido por Justine G · 1 votante
Do not retain
Constitution First
Dirigido por Ann Vandersteel
Chief Justice Carlos G. Muñiz generally follows a conservative textualist approach, emphasizing constitutional text, original public meaning, statutory language, and deference to elected lawmakers. His abortion and redistricting rulings are highly controversial because they reversed precedent or upheld disputed state policies, yet his vote to place the abortion amendment before voters demonstrates judicial restraint despite his personal opposition. Overall, his record strongly favors constitutional and statutory interpretation over judicial policymaking, although critics dispute how he applies history and precedent in politically consequential cases.
No