Colorado
Nov 3
Prohibit healthcare professionals from providing surgeries to persons under age 18 for the purpose of “treatment in response to a minor’s perception of sex or gender”
5
Join a group to add its recommendations to your ballot.

El Paso County Young Republicans
Led by El Paso County Young Republicans · 26 voters

Vote Naomi Riess - RiessForColorado - HD59
Led by Jeana Werts · 8 voters

"Just done.." with the BS in COLORADO!
Led by Michael K · 1 voter
Arapahoe County Republicans 2026 Endorsements
Posted by Sway
Mike Rosen's recommendations
Posted by Sway
Prohibits sex reassignment surgeries on minors and bans government funding. Troubled kids lack the maturity to make this irreversible choice and should be protected from irresponsible parents who would allow it. At least, they can wait till they’re 18.
15
Join a group to add its recommendations to your ballot.
Colorado Beast Ballot
Led by Rachel Garcia · 11 voters
No Hate in Our State
Led by Meghan Camacho-Culligan · 11 voters
A voice for our community!
Led by Naomi · 8 voters

Working Families Party's Voting Group
Posted by Sway

Colorado Democratic Party 2026 Endorsements
Posted by Sway
Indivisible Colorado Springs 2026 Endorsements
Posted by Sway
Proposition 135 would ban surgeries that alter the biological sex characteristics for those under 18 years old. This proposition would also prohibit government funds or their health insurance from helping to pay for the surgeries. We recommend voting NO on this proposition. - Prop 135 would take healthcare decisions away from patients, parents, and doctors. - Prop 135 could delay or prevent serious care for conditions that affect any child. Doctors, hospitals, and insurance companies can avoid or exclude procedures that they think are legally risky. - Prop 135 ignores the medical association best practices that show that the surgeries can improve health and reduce suicide risk. Families, doctors, and mental health professionals should be the ones deciding what is best for their children.
Ballots Without the BS
Led by Jennifer Repa · 1 voter
I agree that minors should wait until adulthood for irreversible procedures, use less-invasive alternatives, and have more long-term evidence about risks, benefits, and possible regret. However, I cannot get on board with this proposition since the broad wording and narrow exceptions could interfere with necessary medical/cosmetic care for many minors. Decisions should remain with families and clinicians; delays and uncertainty may harm mental health and narrow insurance coverage. Additionally, such surgeries are rare; Colorado's three large pediatric providers report not performing them on transgender patients under 18.

Colorado AFL-CIO 2026 Voter Guide and Endorsements
Posted by Sway
Gunnison County Democratic Party 2026 Endorsements
Posted by Sway

Littleton Love Warriors
Led by Laura · 1 voter
Logan M. Davis's recommendations
Posted by Sway

Mel’s Restorative Justice Picks
Led by Melanie Rose Rodgers · 1 voter

Tara’s Guide
Led by Tara Dye · 1 voter
Western Colorado Alliance 2026 Ballot Guide
Posted by Sway
We encourage voters to vote NO on Proposition 135. We believe health care decisions belong between individuals, their families, and their doctors, and that government should have no role in personal health care decision-making. Punishing doctors with the legal system for providing medically appropriate care and dictating personal decision making is not who we as Coloradans are.

Drew’s Recs
Led by Andrew McArthur · 3 voters
1
Groups weighing in without making a recommendation

BridgeUCCS and UCCS Model United Nations
Led by Mica Law · 1 voter
Passes with a majority vote.
Shall there be a change to the Colorado Revised Statutes modifying existing law by prohibiting surgery on a minor for the purpose of altering the minor’s biological sex characteristics, and, in connection therewith, prohibiting any health-care professional or other person from knowingly performing, prescribing, administering, or providing any surgery to a minor for the purpose of altering the minor’s biological sex characteristics and prohibiting the use of state or federal funds, Medicaid reimbursement, or insurance coverage to pay for this type of surgery?
Proposition 135 would prohibit health-care professionals from knowingly performing specified surgeries on minors for the purpose of altering biological sex characteristics and would restrict public funding for specified procedures.
Why Vote YES?
Children require special protection when decisions may have permanent and life-changing consequences.
Major irreversible medical interventions should be approached with extraordinary caution when the patient is a minor.
The state has an important responsibility to protect children from irreversible procedures that they may not fully understand and whose long-term consequences may affect them throughout adulthood.
The measure reflects the principle that protecting children should take precedence over political or ideological pressure.
Position: Protect minors from irreversible surgical interventions related to sex or gender. Vote YES.