Colorado
Nov 3
Require congressional maps drawn in 2028 to be approved by both a nonpolitical commission and the state supreme court
On your ballot
3
Join a group to add its recommendations to your ballot.

El Paso County Young Republicans
Led by El Paso County Young Republicans · 26 voters
Arapahoe County Republicans 2026 Endorsements
Posted by Sway
Mike Rosen's recommendations
Posted by Sway
Would prohibit congressional redistricting unless approved by the Congressional Redistricting Commission and the Supreme Court.
13
Join a group to add its recommendations to your ballot.
Colorado Beast Ballot
Led by Rachel Garcia · 11 voters
No Hate in Our State
Led by Meghan Camacho-Culligan · 11 voters
A voice for our community!
Led by Naomi · 8 voters

Working Families Party's Voting Group
Posted by Sway

Colorado Democratic Party 2026 Endorsements
Posted by Sway
Indivisible Colorado Springs 2026 Endorsements
Posted by Sway
In the last year, we’ve seen some of our neighboring states change their congressional districts to give one political party more power. Now a special interest group is trying to create confusion in Colorado. Amendment 86 is intended to restrict mid-decade redistricting. We recommend voting NO on this amendment. - Amendment 86 removes and reenacts the congressional redistricting laws that we voted on in 2018, with one change. It requires that any mid-decade changes are approved by our independent Congressional Redistricting Commission and the Colorado Supreme Court. - Amendment 86 ignores that the Colorado Supreme Court has ruled against mid-decade redistricting in 2003 to protect voters’ rights. So, we already have a court ruling against mid-decade changes that the special interest group funding this amendment wants to replace. - Amendment 86 seeks to reduce Colorado’s voice at the federal level by limiting our ability to respond to bad-faith activities by other states. The current constitution already provides fair and non-partisan redistricting every 10 years if the census reveals the need for change. This is a wasteful effort meant to confuse us.
Center Action Fund 2026 Midterm General Endorsements
Posted by Sway
Ballots Without the BS
Led by Jennifer Repa · 1 voter
Regular redistricting follows each census; the next commission is scheduled for 2031. Current law has no specific off-cycle process. Creates an unnecessary barrier if voters want new districts because of changing priorities or other states' partisan maps. The same commission should not control reconsideration of its earlier maps. Will cost the state about $370,000.
Gunnison County Democratic Party 2026 Endorsements
Posted by Sway
Logan M. Davis's recommendations
Posted by Sway

Mel’s Restorative Justice Picks
Led by Melanie Rose Rodgers · 1 voter

Tara’s Guide
Led by Tara Dye · 1 voter

Drew’s Recs
Led by Andrew McArthur · 3 voters
1
Groups weighing in without making a recommendation

BridgeUCCS and UCCS Model United Nations
Led by Mica Law · 1 voter
Requires 55% approval because it adds language to the state constitution.
Shall there be an amendment to the Colorado Constitution concerning congressional redistricting, and, in connection therewith, reenacting the current process for congressional redistricting in the Colorado Constitution and prohibiting modifications to a final map unless at least three public meetings are held, the modifications do not have the effect of dividing communities of interest or purposefully favoring one political party, and are approved by the congressional redistricting commission and the Colorado Supreme Court?
Amendment 86 addresses the circumstances under which congressional districts can be redrawn outside the normal redistricting process.
Why Vote YES?
Congressional districts should not become political footballs that can be manipulated whenever political control changes.
Colorado already has a constitutional redistricting process. Changing congressional districts in the middle of a decade should require a compelling reason rather than becoming a tool for whichever political party temporarily controls state government.
Stable districts provide voters with greater certainty and reduce the temptation for politicians to manipulate district boundaries for partisan advantage.
This is fundamentally a matter of protecting voters from political gamesmanship.
Position: Congressional districts should not be casually redrawn in the middle of the decade for partisan purposes. Vote YES.